Electron and Phonon Confinement and New Surface Phonon Modes in CdSe-CdS Core-Shell Nanocrystals

Electron and Phonon Confinement and Surface Phonon Modes in

CdSe-CdS Core-Shell Nanocrystals

A. Singha^, B. Satpati"'", P.V. Satyam^ and Anushree Roy|*|
"^Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721 302, WB, India
"^Institute of Physics, Bhuhaneswar 751005, India

Abstract

Optical and vibrational properties of bare and CdS shelled CdSe nanocrystalline particles are
investigated. To confirm the formation of such nanocrystals in our samples we estimate their
average particle sizes and size distributions using TEM measurements. From the line profile analysis
of the images the core-shell structure in the particles has been confirmed. The blue shift in optical
absorption spectra, analyzed using theoretical estimates based on the effective bond order model,
establishes the electron confinement in the nanoparticles. Unique characteristics of the nanocrystals
(which are absent in the corresponding bulk material), such as confinement of optical phonons and
the appearance of surface phonons, are then discussed. Making use of the dielectric response
function model we are able to match the experimental and theoretical values of the frequencies of
the surface phonons. We believe that our studies using optical probes provide further evidence on
the existence of core-shell structures in CdSe-CdS type materials.

* Electronic address: |anushree@phy.iitkgp.ernetTiii|

1

(a) (b)

\

FIG. 1: Schematic drawing of the nano-onion and core-sheh type nanoparticles
I. INTRODUCTION

Over last couple of decades, unique physical properties due to quantum confinement e
fects have been reported for a wide range of semiconductor nanocrystalline materials ^|.
Since in these systems surface to volume ratio is high compared to that of corresponding
bulk materials, surface states play a crucial role in determining their physical properties.
The surface of nanocrystals is made of atoms that are not fully coordinated. Hence, they
are highly active and these surface atoms act like defect states unless they are passivated by
either organic ligands or higher bandgap semiconductor materials . Thus, the current
direction in this field of research includes modification of given size-quantized semiconduc-
tor particles by means of surface chemistry. In the literature, we find reports on quantum
dot-quantum well (QDQW) and core-shell nanocrystalline structures due to surface modi-
fications of the particles. QDQW is a three layered structure consisting of a size quantized
particle acting as a core [marked 'a' in Fig. 1(a)] and a complete layer of another mate-
rial on the surface [marked 'b' in Fig. 1(a)] of this core, which is again covered by core
material as an outermost shell. This core-shell-core structure is marked as a-b-a in Fig.
1(a). Colloquially, these particular structures are also called 'nano-onions'. Recently, Dorfs
and Eychmiiller have outlined the preparation and characterization of a series of QDQW
systems containing two wells Js]. Coating nanoparticles by another material yields core-shell
nanocrystals [see Fig. 1(b)] [jj].

In core-shell strucure, like inorganic epitaxial shell growth, the organic ligands cannot
passivate both cationic and anionic surface sites of the core The particles passivated by

2

inorganic shell structures are more robust than organically passivated nanocrystals and have
greater tolerance to processing conditions necessary for incorporation into solid structures P| .
For effective surface passivation, the core particles having certain band gap are capped with
a higher band gap material. Moreover, the conduction band energy of the capping (shell)
material is usually higher than that of the core material with the valence band energy of the

capp.ns ..enal be.„s >owe. TMs ene,etic s.t„atio„ . caUed a type- I st.ct.eU. Due

to presence of higher band gap capping material, the photogenerated excitons in the core
remain localized in the same region and are forced to recombine while spatially confined
in the core. Confinement of electrons in the nanocrystals gives rise to blue shift in optical
absorption and PL spectra of the material. As the non-radiative decay channels through
surface states are not accessible for these electrons, core-shell structures thus formed show
higher luminescence quantum yields , , Q, S, III I lower fluorescence life time
and many other benefits related to tuning of band gap in two materials.

Like electrons, phonons are also confined in nanocrystals. In bulk crystals, the phonon
eigenstate is a plane wave and wavevector selection rule for the first order Raman scattering
requires g ~ 0. In contrast, the spatial correlation function of the phonon becomes finite
due to its confinement in the nanocrystal and hence the g ~ selection rule gets relaxed.
In general, the phonon- dispersion curves of bulk crystals show the frequency to be a
decreasing function of wavevector q. Hence, the first order Raman line shifts and broadens
towards the low frequency side for the nanocrystals. This has been proposed and explained
by phonon confinement model Confinement of phonons for Si, Ge^ _BN^ CdS. ,;Se i_-,,

i3,l3,li],Q,l3-

and many other nanocrystals have been reported in the literature

As mentioned before, surface states play an important role in deciding different physical
properties of nanocrystals. For a plane wave propagating in the x-direction in a bulk crystal,
the temporal and spatial variation of the wave is described by the factor exp[i{kx — ujt)],
where the wavevector k = (u/c) \J eioj); eiuj) is the dielectric constant of the crystal. In
the frequency range between bulk longitudinal optical (LO) phonon frequency, ojlo^ and
transverse optical (TO) mode frequency, ojtoi ^ij^) < 0, is imaginary. Therefore, in this
frequency range the wave decays exponentially in the medium, i.e. it can not propagate
in bulk crystals and only surface modes exist [20]. Because of enhanced surface to volume
ratio these modes appear for nanocrystals and it provides relevant information on surface
states. Recently, Baranov et al have reported the surface phonon modes in ZnS shelled CdSe

3

particles |21|.

Characteristics of bare CdSe nanocrysals are now well established. CdSe nanocrystals
passivated with long organic chain (like TOPO) have room t emp erature photoluminescence
(PL) (quantum yield 10%) with very long fluorescence time [sjls^- The inorganic shelling
of CdSe core by CdS has also been explored and shown to be better for surface passivation.

Previous HRTEM anc
not form an alloy

XPS measurements have shown that shell growth in this system does

24| . The lattice mismatch of 3.9% between CdS and CdSe is small

enough to allow epitaxial growth while still preventing alloying. Moreover, the difference in
band gap ( 2.42 eV for CdS and 1.74 eV for CdSe at room temperature) is large enough
for shell growth. The room temperature PL yield for CdSe-CdS core-shell system has been
reported to be upto 50% P]. The electronic structure in this material can be understood
from molecular orbital model and particle in a box model, as discussed in Ref. |^]. The same
las also been discussed from the analysis of photoelectron spectra from core-shell structure
2^ . The high photostability of the system has been explained by confinement of electrons
and holes in the core-shell region.

In this article, we have discussed the optical properties of marcaptoacetic acid stabilized
bare CdSe particles and CdS capped CdSe particles. The nanoparticles have been char-
acterized by their absorption spectra as well as by high resolution transmission electron
microscope (HRTEM) images. The optical transition is modeled using Effective bond order
model (EBOM). Average particle size and size distribution of the particles have been esti-
mated from both HRTEM images and optical absorption measurements; which have been
further supported by Raman measurements. We have quantitatively analyzed asymmetric
Raman line shapes including both confined optic modes and surface phonon modes. The
observed frequencies of the SP modes in these systems have been compared with the cal-
culations based on the dielectric response function model. In Section II of this article, we
have briefiy discussed the sample preparation procedure, which we have followed. Section HI
deals with analysis of HRTEM images of the samples. Section IV demonstrates the optical
properties of the samples, studied by optical absorption and PL spectroscopy. Detail anal-
ysis of phonon spectra is reported in Section V. Finally, in section VI, we have summarized
our results with a few concluding remarks.

4

II. SAMPLE PREPARATION

A. Chemicals

For sample preparation, Cadmium perchlorate, [Cd(C104)2] and Marcaptoacetic acid
[HS-CH2-COOH] were purchased from Aldrich, USA and LOBA Chemie, India respectively.
Anhydrous Sodium sulfite [Na2S03] and Sodium sulfide [Na2S] were from MERCK Ltd.,
India and S. D. Fine Chem. LTD., India respectively. Solid Selenium powder [Se] and
Sodium hydroxide [NaOH] were used as received.

B. Preparation of stock solution of Na2SeS03

1.0 gm of Se powder was added in 200 ml (1.1 M) hot Na2S03 solu-
tion under stirring condition and then boiled for half an hour. Subsequently,
the solution was cooled at room temperature and the aqueous layer was fil-
tered using Whatman filter paper. This solution is used as the stock solution.

NaaSOs +Se ^ Na2SeS03

C. Preparation of marcaptoacetic acid stabilized CdSe nanocrystals : Sample A

Following Liu etal^, 150 ml of Cd(C104)2 (2 x 10"^ M) and 150 ml of HS-CH2-COOH
(2 xlO"'' M) were mixed and stirred vigorously for about 5 min. Here, the latter acts as a
stabilizing agent. The pH of the solution was adjusted to 9.0 by adding aqueous NaOH (1.0
M) solution and heated to 100"C under N2 atmosphere. Subsequently, 0.5 ml of Na2SeS03
was added drop wise to the solution and boiled again for about half an hour under stirring
condition. The solution turned orange in color indicating the formation of CdSe particles.

D. Preparation of marcaptoacetic acid stabilized CdSe-CdS core-shell nanocrys-
tals: Sample B

For the preparation of coated CdSe-CdS particle, the above CdSe solution was cooled
to 50"C and 20 /il of Cd(C104)2 (O.IM) and 20 /xl of Na2S (O.IM) were added drop wise
alternatively under stirring condition in N2 atmosphere. After 30 min of stirring the solution

5

turned orange-red in color due to formation of CdSe-CdS core-shell particles.

III. AVERAGE PARTICLE SIZE AND SIZE DISTRIBUTION : HRTEM

Samples for Transmission Electron Microscopy were deposited onto 300 mesh copper
TEM grids coated with 50 nm carbon films. Samples A and B are suspended in water;
thus, directly added drop-wise on the grid. The excess water was allowed to evaporate in
air. The grids were examined in JEOL 2010 microscope with Ultra-High Resolution (UHR)
microscope using a LaBg filament operated at 200 kV. HRTEM images of many nanocrystals
for each sample were measured and analyzed.

TEM has been used to determine the particle size and size distribution of the afore-
mentioned nanocrsytals. Also, using_the high resolution TEM, it is possible to confirm the
core-shell structure of nanocrystals [4^. Low magnification TEM micrographs are shown in
Fig. 2 (a) and (c) for Sample A and B, respectively. Fig. 2(b) and (d) are the histogram
plots, obtained by measuring sizes of many particles per sample. Size distribution for the
nanoparticles are usually found to be log-normal:

Here d is the average size and a is related to the size distribution of the particles. By
fitting the frequency plot using Eqn. 1 (solid lines in Fig. 2), we have estimated the average
particle size [d) and a of the particles, which are listed in Table I. The size distribution of
the particles is estimated to be more spread out for bare particles (Sample A) compared to
the other sample.

Transmission electron microscopy measurements provide the convincing proof of the crys-
talline core-shell structure of the sample. Fig. 3 shows high resolution micrograph of selected
nanocrystals along the line profiles. The contrast in the image depends on the electron den-
sity in the object forming the image. Hence, CdS is expected to show less contrast than
CdSe since the former has fewer electrons per unit cell. The line profile of the image con-
trast for Sample A and B corresponding the the images are presented in Fig. 3 (b) and (d).
For Sample A, we observe a smooth drop in the contrast near the edge of the nanocrystal.
In comparison, the line profile of core-shell nanocrystals (Sample B), exhibit a trend of a
stepwise-drop. The contrast can also be explained by the change in thickness of nanocrystals,

(1)

6

Sample

TEM

OAS

Raman

d nm

a

d

a

d

Sample A

5.2

0.22

6.0

0.22

4.7

Sample B

5.4

0.11

7.0

0.11

5.0

TABLE I: Comaparison of the average size and size distribution of the particles in Sample A and B
as obtained from blue shift in TEM images, optical absorption bands and confinement of phonons

Sample

Band I nm (eV)

Band II nm (eV)

PL peak nm (eV)

Sample A

577 (2.15)

538 (2.31)

Sample B

606 (2.05)

477(2.60)

541 (2.29)

TABLE II: (a) Optical absorption and PL bands for Sample A and Sample B

but it is not very probable that it would occur in such a step-like way. From the HRTEM
images the average shell thickness of the particles in Sample B has been estimated to be 1.2
nm.

From the micrograph [Fig. 3 a], we have determined the lattice spacing in Sample A to
be 3.72 A, which corresponds to (100) plane of CdSe in hexagonal phase j26[.

IV. OPTICAL PROPERTIES OF NANOCRYSTALLINE PARTICLES
A. Electron confinement : Optical absorption spectroscopy

Fig. 4(a) shows the optical-absorption spectra for the samples A and B. The absorption
band energy (wavelength) from these samples are tabulated in Table II. The bulk band gaps
for CdSe and CdS at room temperature are 1.74 eV and 2.42 eV, respectively. Samples A
(CdSe particles) show only Band I at 2.15 eV in optical absorption spectrum (see Table II).
We have observed that due to CdS shell growth a new band (Band II) at 2.60 eV appears
in the optical absorption spectrum in addition to Band I.

The blueshift in the optical absorption spectra of the particle from that for bulk CdSe and
CdS arises from the confinement of charge carriers in the nanocrystals. Assuming the parti-
cles to be spherical, the optical-absorption coefficient of the collection of the monodispersed
particles of average diameter d at low temperature is given by

7

Electronic transition

Confinement energy (ev)

Type

fi

Ai

CdSe

irr-ir^

o o

0.42

1

4.85

55.50

1.23

ir+-irr

b /

0.83

2

1.11

38.71

0.99

D O

0.84

2

0.10

38.71

0.99

2r7-ir+

0.72

3

0.61

70.35

1.17

2r+-irs

o o

0.75

3

1.89

70.35

1.17

irl-iFg

1 o

0.78

3

0.62

70.35

1.17

3rf-ir+

0.76

3

0.01

70.35

1.17

CdS

ir8--ir+

0.40

4

4.13

45.40

1.19

ir7--ir+

0.45

4

1.73

45.40

1.19

TABLE III: The confinement energy, IS.E, changes with diameter of the particle d by following the
relation /S.E = Ai/(F^; where Ai? is in eV and (i in A

^(^)-E (^_g;;^r. . (2)

where, fi is the oscillator strength, Ei is the transition frequency and Fj is the half width
at half maxima (HWHM) for the ith interband transition. Due to thermal broadening and
inhomogeneous broadening due to size distribution of the particles Eqn. 2 is modified to

where P{d) is the log-normal size distribution of the particles, same as Eqn.l. The results
of single band effective mass approximation model do not agree with the optical absorption
spectra of the nanocrystals because it neglects intervalence band mixing and deviation from
quadratic dispersion. This has been shown in the literature for bare CdSe or CdS particles
and CdS-CdSe mixed crystals [l^ have assumed results from effective bond order

model by Ramaniah and Nair on interband transition in quantum dots of CdS and CdSe
and considered the following transitions : IFg^-lFg , IFg^-lFf , IFg — IFg , 2Ff-lFg", 2Fg-lF8 ,
IF^-lFg , 3F7-1F^, for CdSe core IFg -IFt^f-lF^ for CdS shell j22i]. Confinement energies
for these transitions as obtained in Ref. '23] are tabulated in Table IIF We have grouped
these transitions in 3 types for CdSe and 1 type for CdS, according to their confinement
energies. Since the oscillator strength is not very sensitive to particle diameter ci > 2 — 3

8

nm, the value of ft corresponds to those of d= 4.8 nm for transitions in CdS and d= 4.6
nm for CdSe as obtained in Ref. j^^]. The confinement energy (AE) for these 4 types of
transitions vs. particle size have been plotted in Fig. 5. For A{E) we have assumed the
empirical relation

AiE) = A/d-', (4)

where Ai and Xj are constants for a particular transition. We have fitted the 4 types of
transitions with Eqn.4 (shown in Fig. 5) and estimated the values of Ai and Xi for these
transitions, which are given in Table III. Taking Ei{d) = Ef^^ + Ai/d""- we have fitted the
experimental optical absorption spectra, shown by dashed-dotted lines in Fig 4(b) and (c) for
Sample A and B, respectively. It can be seen that the theoretical curves fit the experimental
data reasonably well. The values of average particle size and a from the above analysis
are tabulated in Table I. The same Table also reveals the comparison between the average
sizes of the particles obtained from optical absorption measurements and HRTEM frequency
plots.

B. Photoluminescence

Photoluminescence spectra is obtained using 1200 g/mm holographic grating, a holo-
graphic supernotch filter, and a Peltier cooled CCD detector. Spectra are taken using 488
nm Argon ion laser as an excitation source .

Figure 6 shows the PL spectra from the Samples A and B. The PL peak positions,
obtained by fitting each spectrum by a Gaussian distribution have been tabulated in Table
II. PL peaks from all the samples are slightly blue or red shifted from the first excitonic peak
in the absorption spectra. This shift results from the convolution of the size distribution
and the emitting state and excitation energy for the excitation near the first peak [2^ 3|.
The detail study on the photo-stability of the particles, prepared exactly by the same route,
has been reported in Ref

9

V. CONFINEMENT OF OPTIC PHONON AND NEW SURFACE PHONONS
:RAMAN SCATTERING

In order to understand the nature of phonon confinement and appearance of new surface
modes in our samples, we liave performed Raman scattering studies. Raman spectra are
obtained using the same experimental set up as used for the above mentioned PL measure-
ments. The sht width of the spectrometer during the experiment was 50 /im. The first order
Raman spectra for the sarnples are shown in Fig. 7. Using the phonon confinement model
of Campbell and Fauchet [l^, the first order Raman spectrum Ic{(^) is given by

Jo [w - i^(q)]= + (r„i/2f'
where ci;(q) and Tqj are the phonon dispersion curve and the natural line width (FWHM) of
the corresponding bulk materials, C(0, q) is the Fourier coefficient of the phonon confinement
function. A is an arbitrary constant. j=l for CdS and j=2 for CdSe. For nanoparticles,
it has been shown that the phonon confinement function, which fits the experimental data
best, is W{r,dz) = exp(^^^^), the square of the Fourier coefficient of which is given by
|C(0, q)|^ = exp (— ll^)- Here, di is the average size of the spherical nanocrystals in Sample
A and d2 is the average diameter of the core in Sample B. On the other hand, for the shell
component of particles in core-shell structure (Sample B), we have used an additional phonon
confinement function for CdS shell, given by

|C(0,q)|'-exp

167r2

erf

qit

327r

(6)

where t is the average shell thickness for the particles. The average phonon dispersion in
the bulk CdSe and CdS crystal for the LO phonon modes are taken as 2^, Q

ujiq) = u;i-Au;^{q]) (7)

which fits the experimental curve well in the direction of F-M upto qmax = 0.4. Uq is the
corresponding bulk LO phonon frequency :ujI = 302 cm~^ and ujI= 213 cm^^. Auj^ is the
band width of bulk LO phonon branch : Au^ = 102 cm^^, Au"^ = 118 cm^^. In the above
equations, qj is taken in unit of 27c /aj, where, aj is the lattice constant of the material. We
have taken ai=5.82 A and 02=6. 08 A [26].

10

In addition to LO phonon peak, we have also observed additional peaks in the spectra
for Sample A and B. Keeping in mind the possibility of the presence of the surface phonons
(SP) between longitudinal and transverse optical phonon modes, together with the confined
optical phonon, we have fitted this additional peak with the Lorentzian function

where usp and Tsp are the peak position and the HWHM, respectively, for the SP mode. We
fit the full spectrum for Sample A and B by a combined line shape /(cu) = P d'^) + Igp{uj).
The best fit obtained for both the samples are shown by the solid lines in Fig. 7. The phonon
confinement components are shown by dashed lines and the surface phonon components are
shown by dotted lines in Fig. 7. In the fitting procedure, we have kept d^, t, usp, Psp, A
and B as fitting parameters. For the best fit of the spectra the values of Tq2/2 for Sample
A and Sample B are taken to be 32 cm~^ and 14.5 cm~^. We attribute the variation in the
value of ro2/2 from sample to sample to the difference in size distribution of the particles.
From the non-linear least square fit, the average particle size (di) for Sample A is obtained
as 4.7 nm. The core diameter ((i2)and shell (film) thickness, t, for Sample B are obtained as
4.0 nm and 1.25 nm. This estimates average particle diameter {d2 + 1) in Sample B to be
5.25 nm. The diameters of the particles in Sample A and B thus measured are very close to
the same estimated from optical absorption and HRTEM measurements [see Table I]. We
have observed that the SP modes for Sample A at 183 cm^^ and for CdSe and CdS -like
modes in Sample B at 180 cm~^ and 244 cm~^, respectively. The ratio of A/B is 2x10^ for
Sample A, whereas, the ratio of the same for CdS-like and CdSe-like modes in sample B are
85 and 68.

For core-shell nanocrystals, we have considered the optical modes as the response of the
two types of oscillators under applied electric fields. The effective oscillator strength is
proportional to the density of the oscillators. Assuming nonoverlapping restrahlen bands
for these two modes ujloi > ^toi > ^lo2 > ^^to2, the dielectric response function of a
core-shell particle can be taken as [lol

e{uj) = peiiu) + {1 - p)e2{uj) (9)
where ei^u) and e2{uj) are given by

11

and eoo is the high frequency dielectric constant of the crystal. Here, we have taken p =
t/{t + x), where t is the CdS shell thickness, as taken earlier and x is the depth of penetration
of the surface phonon within the CdSe core region of the core-shell structure. Substituting
Eqn. 10 in Eqn. 9 for both CdS and CdSe like modes and using e{u!) = —{I + l)em/l fsO], we
get the following equation for the surface phonon frequencies of the core-shell nanocrystals:

4 2
CO — UJ

TOl

+ ^T02 +

LU.

TOl.

+

'l-p)e

K

L02

UJ.

T02)

^T0l^T02

1 +

TOl)

K

+

L02

T02)

K

^TOl ^T02

Here, K = {I + l)em// + pe]^ + (1 — p)e^; uloj and ujtoj are longitudinal and transverse
mode phonon frequencies for CdS and CdSe. is the dielectric constant of the medium,
marcaptoacetic acid in our case. The theory of electron-phonon interaction shows that
SP modes with / > 1 and those with /=even can contribute to Raman scattering via the

31

32j | or the Frohlich electron-phonon

deformation potential of electron-phonon interaction
coupling respectively. The higher SP modes (/ > 2) contribute only slightly to the
scattering intensity. Thus, we can assign the surface modes only with 1=2. As before, we
have taken the values of dj^oi and ujlo2 as 302 cm~^ and 213 cm~^ and the values of ujtoi
and UJT02 as 238 cm^^ and 168 cm^^, respectively. The values of other parameters are
= 14.3, el^=5.5 and = 8.9 js^. The average value of t is known from HRTEM and Raman
measurements to be 1.2 nm. The solid line and the dashed line in Fig. 8 shows the variation
of CdS-like and CdSe-like SP frequencies with x for / = 2 using Eqn. 11. The observed
values of CdS-like and CdSe like SP frequencies in Sample B are shown as filled circles in
Fig. 8. These values correspond to x= 1.8.

We have observed that the SP mode for Sample A at 183 cm~^, which is very close
to the value of ujsp (182 cm"^) for pure CdSe particles, obtained from Eqn. 10. On the
other hand, the observed CdS-like SP frequency (244 cm~^) from the shell component of
the Sample B is away from the frequency (252 cm~^) of the same for pure CdS particles,
estimated directly from Eqn. 10 or with x=0 (p=l) in Eqn. 11 (shown by filled square in
Fig. 8). However, it is close to the value, 243 cm~^, obtained from Eqn. 12 with a;=1.8

12

Sample

u;5pCdSe(calc)

LJ5pCdSe(expt)

u;5pCdS(calc)

u;spCdS(expt)

Sample A

182

183

Sample B

177

180

243

244

TABLE IV: Calculated and experimental CdS and CdSe- like SP frequencies in Sample A and B.
The unit for above frequencies are in cm~^

using dielectric response function model for two oscillators. The corresponding CdSe-like
mode in Sample B is expected to appear at 176 cm^^. The mismatch between this estimated
value and observed frequency of SP mode (180 cm^^) for the core material may be due to
the effect of interface between core and shell structure. The SP frequencies for the CdS-
like and CdSe-like modes in Sample A and B as obtained from the experiments and above
calculations are tabulated in Table IV.

It is interesting to note that if CdSe-CdS would form a mixed crystal in the solution,
we expect (from detailed theory of SP modes in mixed crystals) CdSe-like and CdS-like SP
modes for sample B to appear at 204 cm~^ and 267 cm"^, respectively 3|- This is far away
from what we have got experimentally. Thus, the above discussion implies that from the
SP frequencies of the expected shell material, one can confirm the formation of core-shell
like particle, rather than formation of mixed nano crystallites or individual particle of shell
material in the sample.

VI. CONCLUSION

Our goal in this article was to show electron and phonon confinement in the CdSe-CdS
core-shell nanostructure. To this end, we have first confirmed the existence of the core-shell
structure in our samples, prepared by soft chemical route, using HRTEM images. Subse-
quently, to analyze the electronic transitions we focus on optical absorption measurements,
supported by theoretical considerations of the effective bond order model. Furthermore, the
first order Raman line shape of the CdSe-CdS nanocrystals is quantitatively explained by
taking into account both confined phonon modes and SP modes. The frequencies of SP
modes are shown to match well with their calculated values as obtained from the dielec-
tric response function model. We also demonstrate that due to passivated surface states
CdS capped samples exhibit clear SP modes separated from LO modes in core-shell type

13

nanocrystallites. In summery, we have presented a technique to confirm the core-shell struc-
ture in this type of semiconductor nanostructure.

While analysing the optical absorption of the CdSe-CdS core-shell structure using effective
bond order model, we have assumed the expected electronic transitions for CdSe and CdS
particles. The phonon confinement in the shell structure is explained by taking the shell as
a thin layer on CdSe core. The above assumptions may or may not play a crucial role in
analyzing the data. However, more accurate theoretical models are necessary to understand
core-shell strucure better.

VII. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

AR thanks DST and BRNS in India, for financial support.

[1] Nanoparticles:Prom theory and application Ed. Gunter Schmid Wiley- VCH Verlag GmbH &

CO. KGaA, Wcinhcim, 2004 and the references therein.
[2] L. Spanhel, M. Haase, H. Weller and A. Henglein, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 109, 5649 (1987).
[3] D. Dorfs and A. Eychmiiller, Nano Lett. 1, 663 (2001).

[4] X. Peng, M.C. Schlamp, A.V. Kadavanich and A. P. Alivisatos, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 7019
(1997).

[5] W. L. Wilson, P. J. Szajowski, L.E. Brus, Science 262, 1242 (1993).

[6] A.R. Kortan, R. Hull, R.L. Opila, M.G Bawendi, M.L. Steigerwald, P.J. Carroll, L.E. Brus
J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112, 1327 (1990).

[7] C.F. Hoener, K.A. Allan, A.J. Bard, A. Campion, M.A. Fox, T.E. Mallouk, S.E. Webber and
J.M. White, J. Phys. Chem. 96, 3812 (1992).

[8] A.Mews, A.Eychmuller, M.Giersig, D.Schooss,and H.J.Wcller,Phys.Chem. 98, 934 (1994).

[9] M. Danek, K.F. Jensen, B.C. Murray, and CM. Bawendi, Chem.Mater.8, 173 (1996).
[10] M.A.Hines, and P.G.Sionnest, J.Phys.Chem.lOO, 468 (1996).
[11] N. Pradhan, B. Katz and S. Efrima, J. Phys. Chem. B107, 13843 (2003).
[12] M. Danek, K.F. Jensen, C.B. Murray, M.G.. Bawendi Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 2795 (1994).
[13] I.H. CampbeU and P.M. Fauchet, Sohd State Commun. 58, 739 (1986).

14

[14] H. Richter, Z.P. Wang and L. Ley, Solid State Commun. 39, 625 (1981).

[15] R.J. Nemanich, S.A. Solin and R.M. Martin, Phys. Rev. B23, 6348 (1981).

[16] R. Tsu, H. Shen and M. Dutta, Appl. Phys. Lett. 16, 112 (1992).

[17] A.K. Sood, K. Jayaram and D.V.S. Muthu, J. Appl. Phys. 72, 4963 (1992).

[18] A. Roy, K. Jayaram and A.K. Sood, Solid State Commun. 89, 229 (1994).

[19] A. Roy and A. K. Sood, Phys. Rev. B53, 12127 (1996).

[20] R. Fuchs and K.L. Kliewer, J. Opt. Soc. Am 58, 319 (1968).

[21] A.V. Baranov, Yu. P. Rakovich, J.F. Donegan, T.S. Perova, R.A. Moore, D.V. Talapin, A.L.

Rogach, Y. Masumoto and I. Nabiev, Phys. Rev. B68, 165306 (2003).

[22] D.J. Norris, A. Scara, C.B. Murray, M.G. Bawendi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 2612 (1994).

[23] W. Hoheisel, V.L. Colvin, C.S. Johnson and A.P. Alivisatos, J. Chem. Phys. 101, 8455 (1994).

[24] J.Nanda, B.A.Kuruvilla, and D.D.Sarma, Phys.Rev. B59, 7473 (1999).

[25] S-M. Liu, H. Guo, Z-H Zhang, R. Li, W. Chen and Z-G. Wang Physica E 8 174 (2000).

[26] X-ray Powder Diffraction, JCPDS file.

[27] L.M.Ramaniah, and S.V.Nair, Phys.Rev. B47, 7132 (1993).

[28] M. Nirmal, D.J. Norris, M. Kuno and M.G. Bawendi,Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 3728 (1995).

[29] C. Trallero-Giner, A. Debernardi, M. Cardona, E. Menendez Proupin, A. I. Ekimov, Phys.
Rev. B57, 4664 (1998).

[30] H. Bliz and W. Kress, Phonon dispersion relations in insulators (Springer Verlag, p. 97, 1979);

also see Reference [2] p. 63 &; p. 143.

[31] R. Ruppin, R. Englman, Rep. Prog. Phys. 33, 146 (1970).

[32] A.V. Fedorov, A.V. Baranov, K. Inoue, Phys. Rev. B56, 7491 (1997).

[33] F. Comas, C. Trallero-Giner, N. Studart and G.E. Marques, Phys. Rev. B65 073303 (2002).

[34] Handbook of Chemistry and Physics,David R. Lide,Ed. in Chief, CRC Press.

15

FIG. 2: Low magnification micrographs and histogram of the nanocrystals. (a) is the TEM micro-
graph and (b) is the corresponding histogram for Samples A. Similarly, (c) is the micrograph and
(d) is the corresponding histogram for Sample B.

16

FIG. 3: High resolution TEM micrographs and corresponding Hne profiles for Sample A and B.

17

0.4

0.2

0.0

Sample A
Sample B

_ Bulk Band gap

ofCdSe

1.5

0.4

iro

o

U

I 0-0
<

2 -

1.5

0.4

0.2

0.0

1.5

Bulk Band gap
of CdS

1 I

2.0

2.5

3.0

2.0

2.5

2.0 2.5
Energy (eV)

3.0

3.0

(a)

3.5

Sample A

(b)

--Fitted

Band I

1 .^^'^^

3.5

Sample B

Band II

^ (c)

- - Fitted

Band I

1

1 , 1

3.5

FIG. 4: (a) Optical absorption spectra for Sample A and B. The dotted line is the spectrum for
CdSe particles and solid line is for CdSe-CdS core-shell particles. The bulk band gap positions for
CdS and CdSe are shown by arrows, (b) and (c) The dashed dotted lines are the nonlinear least
square fit to the experimental curves (solid lines) using effective bond order model.

18

20 30 40 50 60 20 30 40 50 60
Diameter (A°)

FIG. 5: The variation in AE with respect to diameter, d, of the particle for different transitions in
effective bond order model for CdSe and CdS. The curve through the points are fit to AE = Ai/d^\

tZ3

•a 0.8

CO.4

0.0

Sample A
- Sample B

2.2 2.4

Energy (eV)

2.6

FIG. 6: PL spectra for Sample A and B.

19

FIG. 7: Raman spectra for Sample A and Sample B are shown by filled circles. Phonon confinement
components and surface phonon components are given by dashed and dotted lines, respectively.
Solid lines correspond to the best fit to the experimental data using combined Raman line shapes

20

255 n

1 _ ^

240-

(cm

225-

210-

'avenuE

195-

180-
165-

' 1 '

•

1 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 '

} -l ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1 ' 1

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

FIG. 8: Variation of CdS like (dashed line) and CdSe like (solid line) SP phonon frequencies with
X. The solid circles are SP frequencies for the Sample B. The solid square is the estimated SP
frequency in pure CdS nanoparticle [x=0 ; p=l]

21